About
About ARIA
Mission
ARIA studies when a math tutor should speak up, and when it should stay quiet.
A student-led research initiative at Marvin Ridge High School. We measure the timing decision on public data first, build the tutor around it, and talk to teachers before anything reaches a classroom.
Research
Offline evaluation on public data. A written-down protocol, a locked test set, and the negative results published next to the positive ones.
Tool
The ARIA tutor and its teacher-facing settings. Each step is checked symbolically; Quiet, Balanced and Supportive are cost settings for the timing rule.
Engagement
Teachers, the Khan Lab School summit, and a planned reviewed pilot. Criticism of the study design is the most useful thing anyone can give us right now.
What ARIA is
Getting the answer is not the same as learning to recover.
Origin
The question came from wondering why tutors interrupt students who are mid-thought. Help that arrives too fast can remove the chance to plan, work through confusion, and recover when a strategy fails. That motivates the study; it is not evidence for it.
The gap
Most tutoring software responds to every step. The learning-sciences literature has long asked when help should be given and when it should be withheld, but few tools treat staying quiet as a decision in its own right.
The research question
Can a tutor that verifies each step and chooses when to intervene reduce unnecessary interruptions without leaving stuck students unhelped, and does that timing change how students persist? ARIA is the instrument for asking it.
Scope
Why math?
Four reasons, all specific to mathematics. They explain a scope choice. They do not promise an outcome.
- 01
A step can be checked.
Algebra and calculus steps can be verified symbolically with SymPy. A wrong step is a checkable fact, not a guess about how the student feels, so ARIA only considers speaking after a verified error.
- 02
Productive struggle is well studied in math.
The assistance dilemma (Koedinger and Aleven, 2007) and productive failure (Kapur, 2008) both come out of math learning. There is a real literature for this work to be measured against.
- 03
Wheel-spinning was defined on math practice.
Beck and Gong (2013) described students who keep attempting a skill without mastering it, using math practice data. It is the outcome ARIA-Pace predicts.
- 04
The logs we have are math.
The public ASSISTments 2009–10 skill-builder logs are math problem sets. Our replay says something about those logs only, and nothing about other subjects.
Roadmap
Five phases, in order. We are early.
- Phase 1Synthetic think-aloud dataComplete
- Phase 2Timing model on real student logsCurrent
- Phase 3Student interviewsPlanned
- Phase 4Formative prototype testingPlanned
- Phase 5Classroom and teacher-informed evaluationPlanned
Team
Two student researchers.
Naren Saravanan and Karthik Malireddy, Marvin Ridge High School, Waxhaw, North Carolina.
Meet the teamGet involved
Where we need help.
Teachers
Try the 8 moments and help plan a reviewed classroom pilot.
Get in touchResearchers
Review our methods, replicate the replay, or collaborate.
Get in touchStudents
Tell us how a hint should feel when you are stuck.
Get in touchAdvisors and mentors
We are looking for an adult advisor for ethics review and study design.
Get in touch